Medicare Premiums Tax Deductible - Independent Contractors Or 1099 Employees - The Risks
Good evening. Yesterday, I learned all about Medicare Premiums Tax Deductible - Independent Contractors Or 1099 Employees - The Risks. Which is very helpful if you ask me so you. Independent Contractors Or 1099 Employees - The RisksThe Independent undertaker of a package deal status of workers is being seriously challenged by the Irs. Between 1988 and 1992 the Irs reclassified more than 400,000 Independent Contractors to employees and collected over .5 Million (,500,000) in back taxes. In 1992 alone the Irs conducted 1,700 audits of businesses, reclassified 90,000 workers and collected Million (,000,000) in tax assessments. (Statistics from Us chamber of Commerce, 1993). If you are a businessman who utilizes Independent Contractors during the year, your firm could be in jeopardy. Do not be lulled into a false sense of security by the Irs's October 25, 1995 proclamation that "Due to federal spending cutbacks, we will cease our long time convention of random tax return audits."
What I said. It is not the final outcome that the real about Medicare Premiums Tax Deductible. You check out this article for info on anyone need to know is Medicare Premiums Tax Deductible.Medicare Premiums Tax Deductible
Our field here is Not about "random audits." It's about a specific, identifiable targeted group. These audits have been very profitable to the Us Treasury. It's a hot issue and not about to be forgotten or relegated to the back burner any time soon. Stay awake on this one, folks! This description is not intended to be a negative shot at the Irs, but rather a warning to firm owners who hire "Independent Contractors." Be Aware and Be Prepared! Failure to do so could cost you a lot of money, a lot of grief, and perhaps even your business.
Most firm population want to play by the rules. But, What Are The Rules in this game? If a laborer is classified as an "Independent Contractor", the firm which hires him must file a Form 1099 with the Irs whenever the gross compensation for that someone exceeds 0 in a calendar year. The Independent undertaker of a package deal is then required to pay his own revenue taxes, collective security taxes (called self-employment tax), Medicare, Unemployment taxes and worker's compensation insurance premiums. Oh, and don't forget the state revenue taxes (7.2% in Utah, up to 11.3% in California). If a form 1099 is completed and sent to an Independent undertaker of a package deal somebody had best be paying the taxes. Obviously, the someone who did the work and received the 1099 form is responsible for all the taxes due. It is his responsibility, but what if he doesn't pay? What if he has no money, and no assets? He then becomes a very good candidate for status reclassification. What that means in plain English is, somebody is going to pay those taxes. Guess who? In this case the Irs will go after the someone or firm who issued the 1099 form. Businesses who "hire" or use the services of a subcontractor or "self employed" laborer need to be very careful whose services they use and in what manner, or on what basis, they use these people. firm is no longer simple; even the most honest and well intentioned firm owner can get caught in this trap.
You never meet the Irs on a level playing field, for they have too much staying power, too many assets to call upon. Even when you win, you lose. The time requirements of the battle, the emotional drain and trauma connected with the operation are often devastating to both the owner and the business. Even large and titanic businesses that are financially solvent face imminent danger when faced with laborer reclassification. And, if they settle to hire all the workers as employees, supply them with the laborer benefits, pay withholding taxes, worker's compensation, etc., they find that they cannot remain competing in today's market. As an example, a contracting firm which used subcontractors found themselves in this pickle. They had been assessed ,000 in laborer misclassification taxes, along with ,000 in interest plus penalties. They contested the Irs decision, went to court and "won" their case. In order to prosecute their claim against the Irs, they had to pay their attorneys over ,000. Although the court found in their favor they are still waiting, over 18 months later, for their ,000 repayment from "winning" their case. They had perfect records, and all their subcontractors had signed well written Independent undertaker of a package deal Agreements. They won the battle, but lost the war. The fight with the Irs drained their resources, dried up their cash flow and put them out of business.
Independent Contractors are very often entrepreneurs by nature and are very heavy on the independent part. They don't want a boss to supervise them, and many are truly responsible sufficient and skilled sufficient not to need one. Thank goodness for these craftsmen, especially the dependable ones. So you hire these mavericks, the job gets on agenda and you pay them. At the end of the year you send off a 1099 and the ball is in their court. Okay, what if he drops the ball and doesn't pay, or doesn't even file a tax return? We have already discussed the possible consequences of this scenario above and you know that this part of the story Can get real ugly, real fast. Here are the possible costs that may fall to the "innocent," or perhaps more accurately, the "uninformed" firm owners: Hefty assessments which could go back some years and will consist of back taxes, interest and penalties, and both halves of collective security and Medicare. These last 2 taxes alone presently total up to 15.3% of the employees income. Even if your Independent undertaker of a package deal pays all his taxes, this still might not be sufficient to let the businessman off the hook. If a firm uses what they think are "Independent Contractors" the Irs may settle either this designation is correct. The first questions the Irs will ask is does the firm have the right to operate and Direct what the workers do. If so, the Irs may think the workers to be employees and not Independent Contractors, and Zap, reclassification occurs! In this case, the Irs will examine all the back taxes, penalties, interests, etc. Which were discussed above. In cases, this added burden is sufficient to put you out of business.
The Irs has a list of criteria from which it will settle either the laborer is an Independent undertaker of a package deal or an employee. According to the Irs, none of the listed criteria is more leading than the others, but rather it is the cumulative ensue of the situation which determines the status of the worker. (In other words, the Irs doesn't want to tell us which of the criteria are most leading in manufacture this determination). If the laborer does the following, the Irs will classify the laborer as an employee:
1. Must comply with the employer's directions concerning the work;
2. Receives training from or under the direction of the employer;
3. Provides services that are dovetailed into the business;
4. Provides services that must be performed personally;
5. Cannot hire, supervise or pay his own assistants;
6. Has a chronic relationship with the employer;
7. Must ensue set working hours;
8. Works full time for the employer;
9. Does all or most of his work on the employer's premises;
10. Must do his work in the order outlined by the employer;
11. Must turn in periodic reports to the employer;
12. Is paid for time worked, weekly, monthly, etc.
13. Receives payments for tour and other firm expenses;
14. Depends on the owner for his tools and materials;
15. Has no big venture in factory or tools needed for his work;
16. Cannot earn a profit or suffer a loss based upon his own services;
17. Works for only one owner or firm at a time;
18. Does not offer his services to other fellowships or the public;
19. Can be fired by the employer;
20. May quit at any time without suffering any liability.
You Can Avoid These Pitfalls
The Irs offers Small firm workshops. Call your local Irs office and ask for the dates, times and places. They also have written materials such as Publication 937; it free for the asking. Some fellowships during modern years have referred their workers to 3rd party payroll services who truly hired the laborer and then leased him back to the client company. Under this arrangement, the laborer is chosen by the company, but the 3rd party assistance pays his wages as directed by the client company. The payroll firm issues the W-2 and withholds all state, federal and Fica taxes. This idea is truly creative, But has not all the time held up to scrutiny in the courts, and frequently, tax liability has been extended back to the real employer. The Courts and Irs firmly believe that "if it looks, acts, walks and quacks like a duck, it is a duck."
The "C" corporation is one of the oldest, most tried and tested firm entities, and probably offers the best clarification for this growing problem. Businesses should insist that all Independent Contractors they employ operate as a "C" corporation and not a sole proprietorship. When properly formed and organized, the corporation establishes a firm relationship that will forestall reclassification under the Irs questions asked above.
"Wait a minute, not so fast, " you say. What does becoming a corporation have to do with the questions asked by the Irs (listed above)?" The retort is a firm "everything," if properly operated as a conspiratorially held corporation (for the "duck" test still applies). The laborer is an laborer of his corporation. The corporation, and not the laborer is hired. Point by point, examine by question, the party for whom the work is done and the laborer are clearly separated, and will pass the Irs test with flying colors.
The corporation is its own entity, not to be confused with an private or construed to be an employee. For example, corporate officers must not commingle corporate and personal funds. Billing statements must be issued by the corporation and not the individual. The laborer becomes an laborer of the corporation which pays him a wage and withholds all the standard taxes. Stockholder meetings must be held and correct records kept. "When savvy firm owners come to understand how this works, they will insist that all their independent contractors incorporate. Many California and Nevada firm population have been using this package for years." "Anybody who is in firm today, earning a profit and paying taxes ought to have a Nevada corporation in their cash flow loop." You may say, "Well, if all this is true, my Cpa and/or attorney would have told me, and would have set up these principal safe guards." Wrong! Your attorney is trained to deal in history - he can defend your past actions. Neither law school nor the actual convention of law in today's world prepares him to supervise your firm and recommend ways to best safe yourself. In fact, when is the last time your attorney has called you and given a advice which has benefited you, or your business?
And, unfortunately, in most cases, your accountant has been reduced to a mere functionary, particularly with the increased use of computerized tax making ready programs such as Turbo Tax and others. Your accountant now merely plugs in your figures and the computer spits out the completed return. Also, did you know that your accountant is required to ask the Irs for an understanding letter in the event he disagrees with a deduction you want to use? Or, if he doesn't have sufficient time to get the understanding letter, he has to send a letter with your return stating that he disagrees with the following deductions. I'm sure there are bigger red flags for the Irs, but I'd be hard pressed to find one. This letter will truly open you up to the obvious perhaps of an audit. And, it makes your accountant even more conservative with your return than normal. A firm owner today who doesn't know all the rules is like a someone bowling in the dark. He has no idea what he is doing. Don't bowl in the dark, become informed instead, because where the Irs is involved, what you don't know can hurt you! You're on your own out there. It's a jungle, and you need all the security you can get.
I hope you have new knowledge about Medicare Premiums Tax Deductible. Where you'll be able to offer use within your day-to-day life. And most significantly, your reaction is passed about Medicare Premiums Tax Deductible.